A simplified low-cost phantom for image quality assessment of dental cone beam computed tomography unit.

INTRODUCTION: A standardised testing protocol for evaluation of a wide range of dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) performance and image quality (IQ) parameters is still limited and commercially available testing tool is unaffordable by some centres. This study aims to assess the performance of a low-cost fabricated phantom for image quality assessment (IQA) of digital CBCT unit. METHODS: A customised polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cylindrical phantom was developed for performance evaluation of Planmeca ProMax 3D Mid digital dental CBCT unit. The fabricated phantom consists of four different layers for testing specific IQ parameters such as CT number accuracy and uniformity, noise and CT number linearity. The phantom was scanned using common scanning protocols in clinical routine (90.0 kV, 8.0 mA and 13.6 s). In region-of-interest (ROI) analysis, the mean CT numbers (in Hounsfield unit, HU) and noise for water and air were determined and compared with the reference values (0 HU for water and -1000 HU for air). For linearity test, the correlation between the measured HU of different inserts with their density was studied. RESULTS: The average CT number were -994.1 HU and -2.4 HU, for air and water, respectively and the differences were within the recommended acceptable limit. The linearity test showed a strong positive correlation (R2 = 0.9693) between the measured HU and their densities. CONCLUSION: The fabricated IQ phantom serves as a simple and affordable testing tool for digital dental CBCT imaging.

ESTIMATION OF PEDIATRIC DOSE DESCRIPTORS ADAPTED TO INDIVIDUAL SPECIFIC SIZE FROM CT EXAMINATIONS.

Clinical challenges in pediatrics dose estimation by the displayed computed tomography (CT) dose indices may lead to inaccuracy, and thus size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) is introduced for better-personalized dose estimation. This study aims to estimate pediatric dose adapted to specific size. This retrospective study involved pediatric population aged 0-12 y. SSDE was derived from scanner reported volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), based on individual effective diameter (Deff) with corresponding size correction factors. The correlations of Deff with other associated factors such as age, exposure setting, CTDIvol and SSDE were also studied. The average Deff of Malaysian pediatric was smaller than reference phantom size (confidence interval, CI = 0.28, mean = 14.79) and (CI = 0.51, mean = 16.33) for head and abdomen, respectively. These have led to underestimation of pediatric dose as SSDE was higher than displayed CTDIvol. The percentage differences were statistically significant (p < .001) ranged from 0 to 17% and 37 to 60% for head and abdominal CT, respectively. In conclusion, the clinical implementation of SSDE in pediatric CT imaging is highly relevant to reduce radiation risk.

OPTIMIZATION OF RADIATION DOSE IN CT IMAGING: ESTABLISHING THE INSTITUTIONAL DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS AND PATIENT DOSE AUDITING.

The aim of this study was to propose local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) for the most common computed tomography (CT) examinations (including contrast and non-contrast scan phase) performed at Advanced Medical and Dental Institute (AMDI), Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Malaysia. A retrospective CT dose survey of 1488 subjects from January 2015 until December 2018 was performed at AMDI USM, Malaysia. The proposed DRLs were established at 50th and 75th percentile of dose distribution for all dose metrics (CT dose index [CTDI]; CTDIvol, CTDIw and dose-length product). The proposed LDRLs were compared with national DRLs and other established DRLs. The 10 most common CT examinations at AMDI were thorax-abdomen-pelvis (TAP) CT (46%), followed by pelvis CT (17%), abdomen-pelvis CT (10%), brain/head CT (9%) and other CT protocols. The local DRLs were established using the third quartile values of dose distribution and were categorized based on CT region protocols. Most of the proposed DRLs were exceeded the national DRLs (63%) and other international DRLs (67%). From the dose auditing, almost half of the recent dose data (for year 2018) exceeded the proposed local DRLs and the unusual dose were observed in TAP, brain/head and pelvis CT examinations. The unusual higher dose could be due to higher mAs settings, higher number of scan phase for contrast study and higher pitch factor. The local DRLs should be established for dose optimization and reduction of the occurrence of excessive radiation exposure to the patients. The establishment of the Ads and LDRLs should also consider all the factors that affect the variation in DRLs such as CT technology, scanning protocols and population characteristics. The local dose distribution should always be revised for improvement of the current local practice.